Match Stats

Stats – Millers v QPR


Rotherham United’s FA Cup run came to an end yesterday but not before the Millers had taken the lead and took Championship side Queens Park Rangers to extra time and penalties.

But what about yesterday’s stats?

The hosts edged the possession having fifty-four per cent but the Millers had ten corners to their eight and won sixty-four per cent of the aerial duels.

Our passing accuracy in our opponents half came out as fifty-five per cent, Rangers having a couple per cent more with both sides crossing accuracy being twenty-three per cent. We conceded eight fouls, the hosts ten more with two yellow cards being issued to the Millers and one to Rangers.

Attack wise Rotherham had seventeen shots at goal of which four were on target, thirteen of those shots from outside the box. The Hoops had seven shots on target from twenty, fifteen of those outside the box.

As the Boss said in his post match interview he felt we got better as the game went on. And I agree. We seemed to get stronger, more determined. We had a couple of decisions go against us, one probably right, one definitely not and had that one been given . . . . well, we will never know will we.

A good spirited performance Rotherham, now back to the league on Saturday with a visit to the seaside.

Queens Park Rangers
1 – 1
Rotherham United

Kiyan Prince Foundation Stadium

FA Cup

8/01/2022 3:00 pm

Attendance: 7157

Referee: Michael Salisbury

Queens Park Rangers Rotherham United
Dykes (115) Ihiekwe (98)
Archer Vickers
Barbet Wood
Dunne Edmonds-Green (Ogbene 58)
Dickie Ihiekwe
Adamah Harding
Wallace (Odubajo 59)(Drewe 90) Ferguson (Bola 79)
Ball (Amos 70) Rathbone
Barlaser (Odoffin 79)
Thomas (Dozzell 71) Sadlier (Lindsay 58)
Austin (Dykes 59) Smith
Gray Grigg (Kayode 65)


Walsh Johansson
Drewe Bola
Odubajo (Drewe 90) MacDonald
Amos Mattock
Duke-McKenna Odoffin
Field Lindsay
Armstrong Kayode
Dykes Ladapo
Dozzell Ogbene

Game Statistics

20 Goal attempts 17
7 On Target 4
8 Corners 10
18 Fouls 8
1 Yellow Cards 2
0 Red Cards 0
54 % 46

Share this article


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.